Recently, a zealous individual accused Calvinists of teaching that one can simply sit back, just believe, “do nothing else” and be saved. Like so many others, this person fails to make a distinction between justification and sanctification. He mingles these two aspects of salvation together and everything that they entail. For those who unwittingly do this, justification by faith alone is the beginning and end of the salvation process according to Calvinists. Nothing more is required. As long as you have faith you can go out and live like a pagan and still be saved. This is what they think we believe and teach. This couldn’t be further from the truth of the matter. Let’s find out what Calvinist’s really believe.
This is part 1 of a series on sanctification. First, lets define sanctification.
Westminster Shorter Catechism
Q35: What is sanctification?
A35: Sanctification is the work of God’s free grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole man after the image of God, and are enabled more and more to die unto sin, and live unto righteousness.
Westminster Confession
Chapter XIII
Of Sanctification
I. They, who are once effectually called, and regenerated, having a new heart, and a new spirit created in them, are further sanctified, really and personally, through the virtue of Christ’s death and resurrection,[1] by his Word and Spirit dwelling in them:[2] the dominion of the whole body of sin is destroyed,[3] and the several lusts thereof are more and more weakened and mortified;[4] and they more and more quickened and strengthened in all saving graces,[5] to the practice of true holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord.[6]
1. I Thess. 5:23-24; II Thess. 2:13-14; Ezek. 36:22-28; Titus 3:5; Acts 20:32; Phil. 3:10; Rom. 6:5-6
2. John 17:17, 19; Eph. 5:26; Rom. 8:13-14; II Thess. 2:13
3. Rom. 6:6, 14
4. Gal. 5:24; Rom. 8:13
5. Col. 1:10-11; Eph. 3:16-19
6. II Cor. 7:1; Col. 1:28, 4:12; Heb. 12:14
II. This sanctification is throughout, in the whole man;[7] yet imperfect in this life, there abiding still some remnants of corruption in every part;[8] whence ariseth a continual and irreconcilable war, the flesh lusting against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh.[9]
7. I Thess. 5:12; Rom. 12:1-2
8. I John 1:8-10; Rom. 7:14-25; Phil. 3:12
9. Gal. 5:17
III. In which war, although the remaining corruption, for a time, may much prevail;[10] yet, through the continual supply of strength from the sanctifying Spirit of Christ, the regenerate part doth overcome;[11] and so, the saints grow in grace,[12] perfecting holiness in the fear of God.[13]
10. Rom. 7:23
11. Rom. 6:14; I John 5:4; Eph. 4:15-16; see Rom. 8:2
12. II Peter 3:18; II Cor. 3:18
13. II Cor. 7:1
Sanctification – Part III
Tags: commentary, easy believism, Robert Shaw, Sanctification, Trent, Westminster Larger Catechism
As the post preceding this one indicates, the Roman Catholic conflation of justification and sanctification continues unabated. The RC failure to recognize any distinction between the two results in faith + infused meritorious works = justification. This causes would-be Catholic apologists to charge Protestants with easy-believism for affirming justification by faith alone – sola fide. In fact, when you mix justification and sanctification together, a faith + works system is unavoidable.
The truth of the matter is as I have demonstrated in my first two posts on sanctification. Justification by faith alone, which pertains to our legal standing before God, is not the end of the salvation process. Yes, my RC friends, Protestants certainly do affirm that there is an inner transformation granted to us as well, as a result of our “right legal standing.” The transforming work of the Holy Spirit in us enables us to cooperate with God and do good works/obedience. This is sanctification.
Protestants distinguish between sanctification and justification, but we do not sever one from the other or confuse them. We recognize that there is a distinction of properties and function to be seen in each, but both are part and parcel of salvation. Like the old song “Love & Marriage” says, you can’t have one without the other. So the Roman Catholic apologist’s constant lament over sola fide falls flat.